Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
Support / Re: Is there some tutorial of mxAutomation?
« Last post by Johannes @ Robots in Architecture on March 25, 2019, 12:12:04 PM »
Hello,

The setup is actually pretty straightforward as KUKA provides a test program. So you can follow the KUKA instructions for the test program and then just switch to KUKA|prc.
I can then provide you more information if e.g. the modes are a bit confusing. But beyond the buffer modes, everything more or less works like in regular KRL.
Let me know if you get stuck anywhere.

Best,
Johannes
92
Support / Is there some tutorial of mxAutomation?
« Last post by lim_zhang on March 25, 2019, 09:47:26 AM »
i need to use realtime control of kuka,so need this kind mxAutomation tutorial.Thank you!
93
Support / Re: Issue about MXA.
« Last post by Johannes @ Robots in Architecture on March 21, 2019, 10:27:48 PM »
It might still be on my end, unfortunately I cannot test it at the moment.
I first need to find the time to update my robots to KSS 8.5 and then to mxA 3.

Best,
Johannes
94
Support / Re: Issue about MXA.
« Last post by singline on March 21, 2019, 10:47:11 AM »
We did, but with another laptop. Its more than likely my laptop..
95
Support / Re: Issue about MXA.
« Last post by Johannes @ Robots in Architecture on March 21, 2019, 09:18:33 AM »
Did you test it with the KUKA supplied test program? That would be a good first step.
I haven't tested it with mxA 3 yet, but was assured that mxA 3 doesn't contain any breaking changes.

Best,
Johannes
96
Support / Re: Issue about MXA.
« Last post by singline on March 20, 2019, 02:22:51 PM »
Unfortunately, no change. KUKA suggested it may be a library issue, the KUKA has mxA 3 installed.
97
Support / Re: Issue about MXA.
« Last post by Johannes @ Robots in Architecture on March 20, 2019, 12:49:00 PM »
Usually if the OV updates but nothing is received then the firewall is blocking the robot, i.e. your PC is sending data packages just fine but not receiving any.
Try disabling the Windows firewall on your PC!

Also, the robot should be in EXT mode and depending on the setup you might need to press the Reset input (Boolean toggle on the mxA component) a tiny bit longer.

Best,
Johannes
98
Support / Re: Issue about MXA.
« Last post by singline on March 20, 2019, 12:42:59 PM »
When attempting to connect via mxA the robot doesn't initialise, could it be a library error?

Code: [Select]
Progress:
Robot Online: True
Robot Initialized: False
mxA Program Active: False
mxA Buffer: 0 | previous 0 at 12:41
mxA Heartbeat: 254
mxA Average Response: 4 (Submit) / 3 (ProConOS)
Error Robot Interpreter: 0 | (0)
Error Submit Interpreter: 0 | (414 at 12:38)
Error PLC: 0 | (503 at 12:26)
Error KUKA: 83 | (83 at 12:41)
Error PCOS: 783 | (783 at 12:41)

ERROR: No statements can be executed, as the connection has not been initialized.
ERROR: Error messages of the robot controller are active. The $STOPMESS signal of the Automatic External interface is active.
ERROR: The robot program is not active. The $PRO_ACT signal of the Automatic External interface is not active..
mxA Submit Interpreter Error 0 -

Axis Position: A1 0, A2 0, A3 0, A4 0, A5 0, A6 0, E1 0, E2 0, E3 0, E4 0

Am I missing something? The OV updates with a slider..
99
Support / Re: iiwa 7th axis algorithm?
« Last post by Johannes @ Robots in Architecture on March 18, 2019, 11:31:05 PM »
Hello,

What parameters are you optimizing for? I had some success having the additional axis to face away from the target, similar to https://forum.robotsinarchitecture.org/index.php/topic,822.0.html
But of course that cannot optimize for collisions etc.
Maybe you can constrain it so that it only optimizes the positions that have problems?

All of that is very application-specific, which is why we don't have an automatic solver for it at the moment. But any ideas are welcome!

Best,
Johannes
100
Support / iiwa 7th axis algorithm?
« Last post by evo85210 on March 18, 2019, 09:44:20 AM »
Just wondering if anyone is using iiwa with PRC?
I've been setting the 7th axis (E1), by using galapagos by minimizing the run time and it works fine.
but as the project gets more complicated, the longer it takes to calculate the optimal angle.
Currently my project have 5129 targets, having to provide and calculate a E1 for every target is proving to be too time consuming.
So i'm wondering if anyone have another solution?
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]