Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
Support / Re: Collision and Unreachable Position Detection
« Last post by Johannes @ Robots in Architecture on September 13, 2018, 12:00:55 PM »
Hello,

Can you maybe internalize the plane input? That way it's static geometry and we don't need the custom DLLs.

Best,
Johannes
92
Support / Re: Collision and Unreachable Position Detection
« Last post by GammaNYC on September 11, 2018, 06:31:00 PM »
I have interpolation enabled at 1mm resolution (which slows GH wayyyy down), but even then I can't get it to output the correct numbers.
Here's a screenshot of the unreachable path. Even though the simulation shows that one of the axis is unable to reach (hence it turns red) the analysis output does not reflect it.

@singline: cant post the gh file because it uses a lot of custom coded component for which i cant provide the DLLs for.

93
Support / Re: Collision and Unreachable Position Detection
« Last post by Johannes @ Robots in Architecture on September 11, 2018, 04:27:58 PM »
Hello,

My guess would be that the unreachable collision occurs in-between two movements. If you disabled it, make sure to enable the Interpolate Toolpath option in the Advanced Settings, and if it's on, try changing it to a lower value like 1mm.

Also, you get the collision value for each joint, so consider using Mass Addition to sum them up!

Hope that helps!
Best,
Johannes
94
Support / Re: Collision and Unreachable Position Detection
« Last post by singline on September 11, 2018, 09:55:19 AM »
Can you post the gh file?
95
Support / Collision and Unreachable Position Detection
« Last post by GammaNYC on September 10, 2018, 09:17:52 PM »
Hello,

I am attempting to extract the collision/unreachability state of my simulation by looking at the analysis values under the "COLLISION" and "REACHABILITY" outputs, however, there seem to be moments where the path created is unreachable and those outputs still give me a value of 0 on all positions (when they are supposed to give me a value of 1 when a problem is detected).

The simulation still changes the axis to a red color during those moments, but the PRC engine stays gray (meaning everything is fine).

What am I missing?
Is there another output I can monitor to catch these exceptions?

Thanks
96
Support / Re: LIN Speed Synchronization including PTP
« Last post by Johannes @ Robots in Architecture on September 03, 2018, 06:22:11 PM »
Hello Sam,

I don't quite understand the idea, you want to have LIN and PTP motions with the same speed? That will be tricky, as they probably also have different acceleration and deceleration curves.
PTP is always set by the slowest axis involved in a motion, so movements can have very different speeds.
If you describe what you want to achieve, maybe I can help you find a walkaround.

Best,
Johannes
97
Support / LIN Speed Synchronization including PTP
« Last post by seangsiri77 on September 03, 2018, 05:58:38 PM »
Hi all ! I'm Sam.

I have another LIN, and then it's PTP Commander Animation in my code. If I knew the speed of PTP I would have to use. แทงบอลฟรี
What is the best way to find / match the same LIN moving speed? Apart from testing as well as bugs, it's also a speed test. Other LIN ..?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. สมัครแทงบอลฟรี
98
Support / Re: Fusion nc import optimum settings
« Last post by Johannes @ Robots in Architecture on August 31, 2018, 03:38:33 PM »
Hello,

I'm sorry for the confusion, I will word that differently in the next release.
The KUKA|prc message refers to the toolpath reduction inputs, where you can additionally reduce the complexity of a toolpath, which in my experience doesn't work so great in Fusion.
So you can leave the Fusion settings at the default!

Tolerances of 0.1mm and less will also lead to HUGE files. Always consider that your robot is probably less accurate than 0.1mm, at least when you calibrate the tool manually it's VERY hard to get better accuracy than 0.15mm. The same applies to the mechanics of the robot.

Best,
Johannes
99
Support / Fusion nc import optimum settings
« Last post by nickolastd21 on August 31, 2018, 02:58:21 PM »
Hi all has any one found the 2 tolerance perimeters the import function uses?
when i import tool paths i get 2 remarks in the top right of the module, one is the circular interpolation to straight lines but the other is
"Set both tolerance parameters > 0.0 in order to reduce the toolpath."
but fusion does not let you set 0.0 as a tolerance so is it suposed to be 0.1 0.001 0.0001 or am i looking at the wrong tolerance setting?
100
Hello,

Are you sure that you installed the software?
You should have a KUKA|prc V2 tab in the upper row of the GH window.
Is it there?

The screenshot was tiny, so I couldn't see much.

Best,
Johannes
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]